| Back to Computers | Back to Home |
| CASE | CPU | RAM | H.D. | VIDEO | drives | O.S. | SOUND | MONITOR | MODEM | NETWORK |
| Full Tower | PIII600 | 256MB | 60GB | ATI Expert 8MB + video out | 31/2,51/4 Zip,Ls120, CDR,CD, Tape,DVD | WinME
W2K |
SBlive | 17" | 56K | 10/100 |
first
put him together, Bigguy was state of the art, and then some, with many
frills and extras. Intel had just announced it's new MMX technology, and
the new socket 7 boards had just been introduced. This machine initially
had a Pentium MMX166, a 6.4gb hard drive, and a 2mb svga video card. The
6.4gb hard drive seemed extravagantly big at the time. I put a full 64mb
of ram on him at a time when most computers had 16mb or less. My cd writer,
and cd reader are both SCSI devices, and a zip drive at that time was something
you had if you were a graphic artist or some such thing. The only acknowledgment
I made to the past was in the addition of a 5 1/4" floppy for the large
amount of data I had on that media. I later added an LS-120 drive, and
upgraded my modem to 56k, I also upped the memory to 128mb. I have since
put in a card that will let this machine emulate an Apple II. I did this
because, for several years, the old apple was my main computer. These were
the years during which I went back to college, and I am slowly (VERY SLOWLY)
transferring all of my old Apple stuff to this computer. The card is pretty
neat. It will actually run an old style apple drive, so that you don't
have to screw around with trying to read Apple disks on PC drives (nearly
impossible). You also can transfer files (via the tried and true sneaker
net) without the grief of trying to network these dissimilar computer types.
Bigguy is still my main computer although he is no longer my most powerful.
This is my Internet machine, and it is the machine that this web page was
written on. It is also the machine that most of my graphic work is done
on, although I find myself using the NT workstation machine more and more,
particularly for AutoCAD and Photoshop. At one time Bigguy had dual boot
capabilities between NT4 Workstation and Windows 95. I really liked this,
but the limitations of fat16 (the only file system both os's can see) meant
that I needed THIRTEEN partitions in order to get reasonable
efficiency out of the hard drive. There were other problems, which I will
not go into a lot of detail about except to say NEVER USE AN ANTI-VIRUS
PROGRAM IF YOU DUAL BOOT. Of course, I was using a single, massive (for
it's time) hard drive, and was hamstrung by the need to use fat16. It is
possible to use more than one hard drive, and partition using fat32 for
Win98/95, and ntfs for NT4, or even to format different partitions on the
same drive using the different file systems. The problem is that even using
such a system, the boot sector must still be in fat16. I eventually concluded
that for all the time, trouble, and money spent I may as well just put
the two systems on two different computers. One thing that was amply demonstrated
by this system was the clear superiority of NT over Win98/95. On the exact
same system, with the exact same software and hardware, operations in NT
were significantly faster, and the system under NT never crashed.