The Canon D30
|
Type |
Digital SLR |
| Shutter Range |
1/4000 to 30 seconds |
| Shutter Type |
Vertical Travel, Electronically Timed Focal Plane |
| Meter Type |
Silicon 35 zone (capable of semi spot) |
| Meter Range |
EV 2 to EV 20 |
| Exposure System |
Multimode AE, and manual |
| Lens Mount |
Canon EF Autofocus |
| Battery |
BP-511 |
|
Digital Specs
|
| Sensor Type |
CMOS |
|
LCD Display |
1.8" color 144K pixels |
| Sensor Size |
22.7x15.1 mm |
Recording Media |
Compact Flash |
| Sensor Resolution |
2226x1460 (3.25MP) |
File Size |
1.3 mb to .4 mb |
| Focal Length Compensation |
1.6 |
Film Speed Equiv. |
ASA 100-ASA1600 |
A camera like this, has been the day dream of most
serious photographers, since the beginning of digital photography, all
those years ago (five maybe). This is a digital camera based upon a Canon
SLR film camera. As such it is able to take the entire series of Canon lenses,
and accessories. No longer does the avid photographer need to decide between
his serious (film) cameras, and his casual (digital) camera. The dedicated
digital photographer no longer need feel constrained, and apologetic, while
attempting to do serious work with a digital camera of limited ability.
This was not the first digital SLR ever made, but
it was the first to be made at a price to put it in reach of the serious
amateur, or self employed professional. Kodak had made a number of digital
SLR's based upon various film cameras produced by some of the leading camera
makers. These cameras used Kodak's own integrated sensor, and memory back
and were far too expensive for any but the most affluent and demanding users.
Generally these were wire services, or other news agencies. For this type
of user, getting the photos, and transmitting them over the wires, gave
an immediacy which put the competition at a great disadvantage. The news
gatherer who had to depend upon getting film developed, and shipped, would
find himself scooped every time.
Though at a price of $3000 at it's introduction, the
D30 was hardly cheap, compared to the $20,000 or so that the Kodak specials
cost, it was a real temptation. Street price on these cameras soon fell to
about $2500, and then to around an even $2000. This was not too far away
from the cost of a top of the line SLR film camera. At the time of this writing,
Canon has introduced it's new D60 camera, at a street price of $2200-$2500.
This is not expected to cause the prices of the D30 to fall sharply for a
while, because of the backlog Canon has in filling D60 orders. When the smoke
clears, cost of the D30 will probably hover around $1500, while that of
the newer model will be around $2000. What these cameras have done, along
with similar offerings by Nikon, and Fuji, is to make the make available,
at an affordable price, a digital camera respectable for serious work.
Considering that this is a professional grade camera
with high resolution and the flexibility of the full range of Canon lenses,
there are a number of features meant to appeal to the casual, or snapshot
photographer. The autofocus feature comes to mind, as does the option for
fully programmed exposure. There is also a series of AE settings collectively
referred to as the Easy Shooting Zone. Each member of the series is pre
programmed to give good results taking the following types of shots:
- Portrait (Low Aperture, center spot metering)
- Landscape (High Aperture, averaging metering)
- Close up
- Sports (high shutter speed)
- Night scenes (Auto flash, combined with slow shutter speed)
Type of metering used, points of focus, and balance of shutter speed
and aperture selected, are weighted against average conditions encountered
in taking these types of photographs. The camera also features a pop up flash
unit, with a guide number of 39 (ASA 100). It is possible to take this camera,
knowing little or nothing about photography, and take reasonably good photos
under most conditions. For the photographer who is a bit more experienced,
prefers to control the process more closely, or runs into unique situations,
there are the more advanced options.
The Creative Zone, is what Canon calls it's series
of more traditional, non programmed exposure modes. These modes are
- Manual exposure
- Aperture Priority
- Shutter Priority
- Automatic Depth of Field
Most photographers are familiar with how these types of auto exposure
work, with the exception of the Auto depth of field. This setting checks
all three of the focus points, in the cameras viewfinder, and sets focus,
and aperture, so that they will all be in focus.
The images are stored on Compact Flash media. Type
I and type II are supported, meaning that the user has an option to go with
the remarkable IBM microdrive. The microdrive is a tiny 1" hard drive unit
which will hold up to 4 gigabytes. The camera comes standard with a nearly
useless 16mb Compact Flash module, which will hold 12 pictures, at the highest
quality, or 40 at the lowest. The microdrive comes in sizes of 340mb, 512mb,
1 gb, 2.4 gb, and 4gb. I have seen standard, solid state Compactflash cards
in sizes as large as 512mb.
The images can be stored in two resolutions: large
(2160x1440) or small (1440x960), and two qualities: normal or fine. This
gives a total of four different image modes. Though the sensor itself has
slightly higher resolution (2226x1460) some of the border pixels are not
used. The quality setting determines the amount of compression that will
be used to store the image. Compression is a tricky thing. Though it does
not technically change the resolution, at high compression levels image
quality suffers, and "artifacts" of the compression algorithm can sometimes
be noticed. Images with many changes, and textures tend to suffer more from
this effect, than less complex compositions. For the real die hard, there
is the option to save the images in the RAW format, with no compression at
all. The raw image file is 3.4 mb in size, compared to 1.3 for large/fine,
.7 for large/normal, .7 for small/fine, and .4 for small/normal. A 1gb drive
gives a capacity of 721 large/fine photos, or 2500 on small/normal.
The heart of any digital camera is it's imager. The
imager, and the storage media combine to do the same job as the film of
a conventional camera. In the D30, this is a small CCD unit, developed by
Canon for still photography. CCD units are very popular in camcorders, though
they had not been previously used for still cameras because of some technical
problems regarding noise. In video work this noise is not noticeable enough
to be objectionable, but still photography makes the eye more critical.
Canon claims to have solved the noise problems, and this does seem to be
the case. The photographs taken with the D30 are rich, crisp, and clear.
The only noise I noticed was a bit of interlace from a black cloth background.
I am working on a page comparing the quality of today's films with that
of the top of the line digital cameras. The results surprised me. In summary,
these imagers are nearly as good as film, and can actually surpass film,
when the variations of developing, and printing are taken into consideration.
Of course, this is only for picture that will be displayed digitally. If
the pictures are printed out, there is a limitation of quality dependent
on the printer. Hardcopy of digital photographs is somewhat inferior to
that of film photography, particularly if the film photograph is developed
by hand, using the skills of an experienced printer.
The Effect of
Film Speed on Image Quality of the D30
|
ASA 400
(cropped down from a much larger photo)
|
A friend as he looks in average room lighting.
Note that the ASA 1600 photo lacks the resolution, and color rendition of
the ASA 400. Note also that the ASA 400 photo is a bit less sharp, due to
the lower shutter speed required.
|
ASA 1600
(cropped down from a much larger photo)
|
The
imager of the D30 is capable of operating at film speeds ranging from ASA
100 to ASA1600. The higher film speeds bring with them the traditional disadvantages
well known to generations of film photographers. Chief among these are
noise, and reduction of gray scale. In film cameras, this is produced by
the need for larger, more irregular grains of silver halide, needed to
work with smaller amounts of light. This tends to make the pictures granier.
On digital cameras, noise is an artifact of the natural, random signals
given off by the sensor. These signals are generally below the threshold
of the signals produced by the light striking the face of the sensor, and
are overpowered by them. As the light intensity drops, these lower level
signals become noticeable. Another problem of operating at low light levels,
using fast film, is the problem of loss of contrast, and color saturation.
still, a higher ASA rating will get you a picture that might not be possible
with a lower setting.
|
If there is any real handicap to using a digital camera,
it is the constraint placed upon the digital photographer of always using
the same imager, no matter what the conditions or effect desired. The film
photographer has a distinct advantage here, because of the film camera's
capability of being loaded with any of a multitude of films being produced.
Film photographers have bulk loaded everything from commercial movie film
to 35 mm microfilm into their cameras. There is also a selection of special
purpose films such as Infra Red, High Contrast, and false color films.
One of the ways that digital cameras can fight back,
and get more versatility, is by the use of film speed settings, and quality
settings (parameters can also be used, but I do not use them, or know enough
about them to really comment). This give the user a bit of versatility,
though not to the degree of that enjoyed by the film photographer. Still,
the technology is moving along, and who can say what types of imagers might
be a few years down the road. Of course, film and chemical technology are
not standing still either. It will be interesting to see what development
lie ahead in both areas.
The Effect of Image
Quality Settings on the Canon D30
|
High Quality
|
These two photos are taken of the exact same subject,
with the exact same exposure, under the exact same conditions. Only the quality
level has been changed. Some added detail loss can be seen in the cross
hatch pattern (this is a photo of a Fresnel lens) in the average quality
image.
|
Average Quality
|
In addition to the film
speed setting, the D30 offers the option of two resolutions, and two quality
levels. The purpose of different levels of resolution is intuitively obvious.
The selection of quality levels is not really an artistic or an adaptive
control. The main function of the selection of quality levels is to give
the photographer some control over the file size of the images produced.
This is done by selecting between different levels of compression when the
images are being stored. In the D30, images are generally stored in the JPEG
format, which is a compressed format. Compressed format use algorithms to
look for patterns so that they can throw details away, and give smaller file
sizes. These same algorithms are used when the image is viewed, to reconstruct
the details that were taken out. Naturally, nothing conforms exactly to
any pattern or algorithm, and bits of the detail will not be reconstructed.
At higher compression levels, you get smaller files, but less accurate reconstruction
all the fine details. The more irregular, textured, or busy a scene is,
the more the compression effect will be noticed. The best candidates for
high compression are sunsets, and wide open vistas. The worst subjects for
high compression are diagrams, printed pages, or anything with a considerable
amount of detail or contrast.
|
The metering system of the D30 is a carry over from
the EOS series of film cameras. The meter will set exposure down to EV 2,
at a rated sensitivity of ASA 100. This is not particularly sensitive, even
compared to some of Canon's own previous offerings, but is good enough for
dim lighting, and even some limited night shooting. The old F series were
capable of metering down to EV 2.5, giving the newer cameras a half stop
advantage. The meter breaks the image up into 35 different zones of measurement.
This gives the capability of setting up a number of different metering patterns
for different
types of situations. This is what makes the Easy Shooting Zone settings
possible. So for landscapes, the metering pattern will be bottom weighted,
under the assumption that the upper portions of the frame will be filled
by the relatively bright sky. For portraits, semi spot metering will guarantee
that a face which fills the center of the composition, as is the case in
most portraits, will be perfectly exposed. For Close ups, center weighted
is just the thing. My favorite feature is a resurrection, of sorts, of the
old TTL semi spot metering of the old F series. When this option is chosen,
the EOS series does the old FD cameras one better by using a 9.5% circle,
as opposed to the FD 12% rectangle. This is the only metering setting that
I use.
The photographer has two ways to view his work. The
first, and most obvious, is through the viewfinder. As a reworked SLR,
the D30 has a regular eye level, pentaprism viewfinder for through the
lens viewing via a ground glass screen. The eyepiece has a dial to give
up to 2 diopters of visual correction, for users who wear glasses. The viewfinder
itself displays the three focusing marks (user selectable, of course), along
with shutter, aperture, flash, and autofocus information. There is also
a slightly shaded ring, which shows the metering area when semi spot metering
is selected. What is missing from the viewfinder, in this autofocus camera,
is any kind of focusing aid. This can make precise focus with a non autofocus
lens, rather difficult, particularly when using slow lenses.
To check photographs already taken, there is a built
in color LDC screen on the camera back. The screen can not be used to compose
or preview photographs, as it only displays what has already been stored
in the memory. The resolution of 300x480 (144,000 pixels) is about half that
of a standard VGA monitor, and not too far inferior to that of the sensors
on cameras from just a couple of years ago. There is more to the LCD screen
than a fancy way to view your images. The images can be zoomed in on, and
the screen can also be used to view camera settings. On top of all of this,
Canon has included a way to display histograms, charts of color balance,
brightness, contrast etc., on this display. This is not a feature that I
use, preferring to view and adjust these levels in Photoshop (if at all),
but some users might find them convenient.
Two dials control most of the operations of the camera.
The dial to the left of the pentaprism, selects the shooting mode, while
the dial to the right sets the exposure. It is possible to use the camera,
while never touching another control, other than the power switch. For those
who enjoy a bit more creative control of their image, the D30 is able to
oblige. In addition to the easy Shooting Zone Settings, and the Creative
Zone settings, the camera has exposure compensation, and the option of setting
parameter definitions, which allow for customizing the color balance, brightness,
contrast, and intensity. Different sets of parameters can be defined
as sets, so that the demanding photographer can create a special parameter
set for indoor lighting, another for cloudy days, and still another for
bright sun.
Personal Observations:
While I have a certain preference for manual exposure,
under most circumstances, I have never cared for autofocus at all. Most
photographers can do the job
faster, and there are some situations, notably low light, under which
autofocus does not work. There is also a problem, with certain compositions,
of getting the camera to focus on the right subject. There are options to
set, the D30 has three different focus points, but the whole thing would really
be much easier and faster with manual focus. Since there is no focusing aid
in the viewfinder, the user has little choice but to rely on autofocus, stop
down, or settle for pictures which are somewhat unsharp. This is my biggest
complaint about the new generation of autofocus SLR cameras.
The D30 has a built in flash, which pops up from the
top of the pentaprism housing when the camera meter decides that it is needed.
The unit is fully integrated with the camera meter system, and has an ASA100
rating of 39. This is more convenient than I had first thought, and the
flash comes in very handy for snapshot type photography, and even more handy
as a fill flash for taking some of the contrast out of brightly lit scenes.
For the more demanding or flash dependent photographer, Canon offers a number
of very capable flash units which are able to fully integrate themselves
with the camera's metering, and focusing systems.
My best friends on this camera, are the exposure hold
button, and the manual override. The exposure hold button is the easiest
way to get by the computer automation, or to photograph off center subjects,
and still get a proper exposure. There is also an exposure compensation
system, for backlit, offset, or oddly colored scenes, but I have never
had good results with exposure compensation; it takes too long, and requires
too much guesswork. The manual override is usable, but not as certain as
an old fashioned match needle camera. The problem with the manual override,
is that it allows the camera to be set with the controls, but does not allow
for full use of the camera meter during manual operation. Even so, it is
good enough when I need it, and is a step in the right direction.
The thing that really sold me on this type of camera,
is it's ability to go all day without the need to be reloaded. The 721 image
capacity that the 1gb microdrive gives this camera, is like having 20 standard
36 exposure rolls of film on tap. On a recent vacation, I was able to shoot
every day, downloading my images into a laptop at night, and never worry
about running out of film. I was also able to see the results of the day's
shooting, without having to take film in for development, and waiting for
it to come back. With smaller image sizes, I can take 2884 photos on a single
1gb drive. Drives as large as 4gb are now available. Though the battery
is rated at only 500 photos, extra batteries can be carried, or the battery
grip can be used. On my trip
to the Grand Canyon, I brought along a lap top computer, and puled
the day's images off of the camera every night, giving me as fresh drive
every morning. I took over 3000 photographs, and never had to worry about
running out of film. I also did not have to worry about enduring my yearly
vacation ritual of going down to the camera store, and grabbing dozens of
envelopes, putting
my name and address on each, enclosing a roll of film in each, and dropping
the whole bundle in the drop box. I also did not have to deal with sorting
and organizing all of my photos, since the digital camera numbers each according
to the order in which it is taken.--- very handy. On top of all of these
other conveniences, I did not have to pay the $500-$700 that it would have
cost to get 100 rolls of film (approximately the number it would have taken
to have shot this many photos) purchased and developed. Now I did not include
all of these photos on my site, cutting the number way down, but I did shoot
that number of photos, and never had to give any thought to the process.
Now that's photography! A photo of a microdrive, along with a standard CF
card, and a USB card reader are shown to the right.
The camera comes with a battery, charger, and AC adapter.
The as adapter works by plugging into a receptacle on the charger. Once
connected, the adapter goes into the camera battery compartment. Canon also
offers a cigarette lighter adapter, and a power grip, which allows the camera
to operate off of two batteries at once. The power grip attaches a bit like
a motor drive, and plugs into the battery compartment of the camera, while
holding two standard batteries. There is a radio controlled remote unit,
and numerous flash options. The most important accessory is the availability
of the entire series of Canon EX lenses.
The down side:
Nothing is perfect, of course, and there are a few small complaints I
have about the D30. With the exception of the sometimes odd color rendering,
these are mostly a matter of personal preference.
- Colors can be weird, and oversaturated.
- Being an autofocus camera, there are no viewfinder focusing
aids.
- Autofocus is slow, and does not work in low light.
- Manual exposure setting can take some getting used to.
- It would have been nice if the meter had true low light capability,
though this may be moot, because of the limitations of the sensor. Better
low light performance would be nice.
Still, all things considered, I am unlikely to return to film, except
for a few specialized uses (like night photography).
D60 Links (The Future)
It's always good to have something to wish for. In
this case, it would be a Canon D60. The camera body, and most operating
features, are identical to those of the D30. There is really only one difference.
The D30 has a 3.25 megapixel imager; the D60 has a 6 megapixel imager. Just
one difference, but oh what a difference it is. On the other hand, most photographers,
especially when doing work for the web, or for digital display, will find
themselves severely reducing image size. I certainly do not feel constrained,
particularly for web work, by the 3.25 megapixel imager.
Canon has, since the D60, introduced the 10D, 1D,
and Digital Rebel. All of these new cameras have higher resolution imagers,
and all are directed towards different markets. The Digital Rebel has a
6 megapixel imager, and is rather lightly constructed. It is claimed to
have a much better autofocus system than the burdensome type slowing the
performance of the D30. The D60, 10D, and 1D are all more heavily constructed,
more along the lines of the D30. The 10D, and 1D are marketed as pro grade
cameras with sturdier metal frames. Other models are certainly on the way.
I will eventually get a partner for my trusty D30,
but it is not a pressing need. First I will probably get a larger micro drive,
and perhaps a more powerful flash unit. I would also get a wider lens, something
which would be much more useful than another camera body. I might also decide
to wait awhile, until Canon comes out with a lower priced model with a full
frame imager. This would make focal length compensation factors a thing
of the past, and will greatly extend the usefulness of my wide angle lenses.
|