| Back to Calico Home |
Back to Main Home Page |
The Helical Feed Magazine (9mm) This is informative and , in it's own way, rather interesting reading, but it is a bit dry, and perhaps more detailed than the casual reader might want. The patent is a general description of the workings of the magazine, and it may be noted that the patent covers the use of this design for cartridges, as well as paint balls.
mags. I have yet to clean mine, after years of service, and they still
function flawlessly. The magazine body is of two pieces. Sliding the top
molding off of the magazine body permits the separation of the two halves.
The magazine should be unloaded, and all tension should be released from
the magazine spring before this is attempted. Once opened, the magazine separates
into a few simple subassemblies which may be cleaned and very lightly lubricated.
All of these diagrams are taken from the manual, and the procedures laid
out there are pretty straight forward. I would caution against the sin of
over lubricating, something that I am often guilty of myself, as this will
be likely to enhance the formation of sludge, and plain old gunk within the
body of the mags. A drop or two of Triflon or Break Free around the spring
should be sufficient. If the worst should happen, and you damage your magazine, or it wears out, there is a repair service affiliated with the "unofficial Calico web page" given in my links. As of this writing, the charge is $30 plus the cost of shipping and parts. This will likely put the total cost at around $50-$100, cheap compared to the cost of replacement magazines, when they can be found. Parts are still available from Calico, though they will no longer sell a civilian one of their magazines.
There are magazine repair kits available for the adventurous (or the cheapskate,
who does not wish to part with an extra $30) The repair kits contain the
internal workings of the magazines. There is also an outer shell kit, which
contains the external parts. So restrictive are the provisions of the magazine
ban, that these parts must not be shipped, or even stored, together. Doing
so would constitute a contraband magazine in the eyes of the B.A.T.F. The
total cost of the parts required to construct a 100 round magazine would be
around $170. This cost does not include legal fees, the cost of your confiscated
gun collection, and jail time, if you are ever caught with it. Possession
of all of these parts, assembled or not, would also make you a felon, and
would prevent you from ever legally owning a gun again. If only real crime
were taken this seriously, and actual criminals treated this harshly. This
situation will end in 2004, unless the powers that be vote the ban into
permanence. In the meantime treat these magazines as if they are gold; ounce
for ounce they are about as valuable.
The photo shows a modification of the original snail shell magazine, made for use with the AK-47 series of assault rifles. It is shown in company with the 50 and the 100 round versions of the Calico magazines, for size comparison. The AK drum holds 75 rounds, and it can be seen that it is much larger than the Calico mags. I can personally vouch for the fact that it is also much heavier, and, despite it's weight, much more delicate. These AK mags are a direct development of the Soviet PPSH mag, one of which is shown with it's cover removed, in the next photo. There is a variation of the AK drum magazine which will fit on an M-16 rifle, and has been modified to feed the .223 round. All of these drums owe their design to the 32 round "snail shell" magazine in 9mm, for the Luger pistol. This was a development for World War One, and was an attempt to give the
trench bound soldier greater firepower in a smaller package. tactically,
this was the precursor to the submachine gun. This same magazine was used
on the German MP 18 submachine gun, though it was later replaced with a
more conventional box type magazine. The 9x19 round of the Calico, and the
7x39mm round of the AK are also shown for comparison. The drum mag of the Thompson works on similar principles, but is modified somewhat. The Thompson drum has no feeder column, and so can only be fired in the 1928 model Thompson, and others designed specifically for it. These weapons do not have magazine wells in the traditional sense, but use a cut out in the frame instead, with multiple locking lugs for the magazine instead of a single catch. The Thompson drum will not fit on the later "M-1" Thompsons produced for use during World War Two, because this model lacks the cut out in the frame. Drums for the Thompson were typically of the 50 round capacity, though there was a large, heavy, and cumbersome version which held 100 rounds available. In addition to the "true" drum magazines, a number of drum style magazines have been produced. The more common versions of these tend to be simple ammunition carriers, rather than actual magazines. These ammunition carriers function as storage boxes for belts on belt fed guns. Guns using these systems, generally feed from the bottom, in the fashion of a magazine fed weapon, rather than from the side, which is the more common method used by belt fed weapons. The old Stoner system, along with the Soviet RPK light machine gun used "magazines" of this type. The other type of "drum style" magazine is actually a standard box magazine which has been curved sideways into a complete circle. The only advantage to this type of magazine is that it does not protrude as far from the magazine well as a straight version would. I am aware of only one example of this type of magazine. It was produced for the AR-15/M-16 series of rifles, and was of molded plastic. Compared to the simple elegance of the helical design used in the Calico magazines, the other drums seem quite primitive, and crude. These other magazines are also considerably more complicated, and delicate internally. They are also all, much harder to load, needing to be opened for loading, and then loaded in stages. The Calico magazines, particularly with the addition of the rapid loading tool, are quite simple to charge. In addition, the more traditional drums are heavy, and their stamped metal bodies are easily dented, and damaged, and susceptible to the effects of corrosion. |